Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoë de Givenchy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Zoë de Givenchy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Zoë de Givenchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources either in the article or online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

• Strong Delete; flagrant peacock article with no real notability. Gimubrc (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Names dropping and nothing indicates subject passes WP:N and WP:ANYBIO. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete The very definition of WP:NOTINHERITED: she married into a noble family and was a bridesmaid for Pippa Middleton. Otherwise she seems to run her own company which is the only criteria with which we can assess her notability, and in that she's non-notable. freshacconci (✉) 15:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete speedy even. The best I could find was one ref in the UK's Daily Mail... Aoziwe (talk) 07:59, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Purely promotional; could have been speedied. SarahSV ^(talk) 05:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Only C Magazine has significant coverage of her, otherwise all sources have only a passing mention. Article makes no claim of notability. -Lopifalko (talk) 06:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.